Informed sources revealed the escalation of sharp differences between the leaders of what is known as the “Southern Transitional Council” in recent times.
The sources stressed the increasing intensity of the differences among the leaders of the transitional council on the mechanism for implementing the Riyadh agreement in its military and security sectors, amid Saudi pressure to implement the agreement in accordance with the chronic mechanism.
The sources pointed out that some leaders in the council see that commitment to the agreement and what it requires is an imperative issue, and that repudiation will put the council in a confrontation with the Saudis who are pressuring them to implement the agreement. ”While other leaders oppose this view and see that the Riyadh agreement threatens the steps achieved on the ground On the path of “restoring the southern state.”
They considered that the Riyadh agreement stands “against all slogans adopted by the transitional council since its establishment.”
The sources pointed out that these differences, differences and positions that appear put the council in front of two options for them three: either to fulfill the obligations required by the agreement, or bear the consequences of non-implementation and the continued control of Aden as a de facto authority, which places Saudi Arabia in a critical position, as it is a sponsor of the agreement and is committed to the government Legitimacy of its implementation.
The sources pointed out that the recent resignation campaign among the transitional ranks revealed the extent of its fragility and the severity of the differences between its leaders.
